In today’s edition of the My Morning Paper, we look into the recent statements made by National Security Minister, the Hon. Wayne Munroe, and his affiliation with the Progressive Liberal Party (PLP). Upon closer examination, it becomes evident that there may be a larger issue at hand than initially perceived.

To understand the context, it is important to explore the reasons behind Mr. Munroe’s departure from the Democratic National Alliance (DNA) to join the PLP. An article from The Tribune on September 10, 2015, sheds light on this matter. In the article, Mr. Munroe explains that he aligned himself with the PLP because he believes their philosophy is more aligned with the future direction of The Bahamas.

While Mr. Munroe’s rationale for joining the PLP may seem plausible, it is worth noting that the party’s philosophy has deviated from its original principles over time. The New Day Progressive Liberal Party government, which they claim to represent, often exhibits a sense of infallibility. Any criticism directed towards them is either attributed to external factors or dismissed as a misunderstanding. The discrepancy between the party’s stated philosophies and their actual practices raises questions about their effectiveness in governing.

The issue at hand is further highlighted in a recent article from The Tribune, titled “Munroe says he always had faith in police force.” The article discusses Mr. Munroe’s shifting stance on the ability of the police to investigate themselves. Prior to assuming his role as National Security Minister, Mr. Munroe advocated for independent investigations of police-involved killings. However, after assuming office, he expressed unwavering support for the police’s ability to handle such matters, despite public skepticism.

The contrasting positions taken by Mr. Munroe raise concerns. Why should his tone drastically change now that he has the authority to effect change? Furthermore, what concrete changes has he brought about in his role as National Security Minister?

It appears that Mr. Munroe’s alignment with the PLP is based on philosophies that the party itself has already abandoned since the departure of the Dissent Eight. This group, including one individual who refused to be a “yes man” to the party leader and prime minister at the time, Sir Lynden, signifies a significant shift in the PLP’s values.

It is clear from Mr. Munroe’s statements that he has fully embraced the “new” ways of the PLP and has become a staunch supporter of their agenda. However, this raises concerns about his objectivity and independence, as he appears to be a “yes man” for the New Day government. The resemblance between the current government and the “Old PLP” cannot be ignored.

It is worth noting that the Minister of National Security should exercise caution and restraint in his public statements. More often than not, his attempts to showcase his intelligence only serve to embarrass himself and potentially undermine the credibility of the PLP. The underlying nature of the Progressive Liberal Party seems to be the root cause of their failures.

Let me end here, the affiliation of National Security Minister Wayne Munroe with the Progressive Liberal Party raises questions about the party’s values, the alignment of its members, and the effectiveness of its governance. The contradictions and inconsistencies in Mr. Munroe’s positions further highlight the need for transparency and accountability within the party.

END

#THENEWDAYOLDWAYPLP